Choosing a document verification partner is a significant decision. This page helps procurement and operations teams understand how TamperCheck compares to Klippa DocHorizon - on pricing, privacy posture, and what it actually takes to get started. Note that TamperCheck works on digital PDFs and scanned hard copies alike - including physical stamp verification and handwritten signature analysis, not just native digital files.
Digital PDFs
text layer + raster analysis
Phone photos & scans
camera captures and flatbed scans
Physical stamp verification
ink bleed, embossing, overlay detection
Handwritten signature analysis
forgery and substitution checks
Documents covered
- TamperCheck.ai
- 100+ document types from 190+ countries
- Klippa DocHorizon
- 50+ document types across finance, identity and logistics
Forensic checks per document
- TamperCheck.ai
- 200+ forensic layers on every upload
- Klippa DocHorizon
- EXIF analysis, duplicate and copy-move checks, pixel-level analysis
AI-generated documents
- TamperCheck.ai
- Dedicated synthesis pass, resolved to the field
- Klippa DocHorizon
- GenAI and deepfake content detection inside the fraud module
Image forgery detection
- TamperCheck.ai
- Pixel-level: splice, resave and edge-sharpness deltas
- Klippa DocHorizon
- Yes - copy-move and pixel-level
PDF & file structure
- TamperCheck.ai
- Objects, fonts, metadata and editor traces
- Klippa DocHorizon
- Metadata-led
Malware & file safety scanning
- TamperCheck.ai
- On every upload
- Klippa DocHorizon
- Not advertised
Digital signature certificates
- TamperCheck.ai
- Issuer and trust chain verified
- Klippa DocHorizon
- Not publishedLimited
Field-level alteration
- TamperCheck.ai
- Yes - the altered field named and located
- Klippa DocHorizon
- Document-level flags; extracted fields are returned separately
Scans, photos & physical marks
- TamperCheck.ai
- Stamps, embossing, signatures, print artefacts
- Klippa DocHorizon
- Scans and photos handled by the capture layer
Automated QC on findings
- TamperCheck.ai
- Every finding re-validated before you see it
- Klippa DocHorizon
- Not publishedLimited
What you get back
- TamperCheck.ai
- A verdict, the field named, in plain English
- Klippa DocHorizon
- Fraud flags alongside extracted data
Time to verdict
- TamperCheck.ai
- About a minute, unattended
- Klippa DocHorizon
- Seconds per document (their claim)
Price per document
- TamperCheck.ai
- $0.50, published
- Klippa DocHorizon
- Not published - subscription or pay-as-you-go, quoted
Commitment
- TamperCheck.ai
- None - no seat fees, no minimum, no cap
- Klippa DocHorizon
- Platform subscription; fraud detection is one module within it
How you start
- TamperCheck.ai
- Self-serve - first top-up matched free, live the same day
- Klippa DocHorizon
- Sales-led - quote required
Document retention
- TamperCheck.ai
- Zero - analysed in memory, never written to disk
- Klippa DocHorizon
- EU-hosted, ISO 27001; documents held for the processing workflow
Training on your documents
- TamperCheck.ai
- Never
- Klippa DocHorizon
- Custom document types are trained on request
| TamperCheck.ai | Klippa DocHorizon | |
|---|---|---|
| Detection depth | ||
| Documents covered | 100+ document types from 190+ countries | 50+ document types across finance, identity and logistics |
| Forensic checks per document | 200+ forensic layers on every upload | EXIF analysis, duplicate and copy-move checks, pixel-level analysis |
| AI-generated documents | Dedicated synthesis pass, resolved to the field | GenAI and deepfake content detection inside the fraud module |
| Image forgery detection | Pixel-level: splice, resave and edge-sharpness deltas | Yes - copy-move and pixel-level |
| PDF & file structure | Objects, fonts, metadata and editor traces | Metadata-led |
| Malware & file safety scanning | On every upload | Not advertised |
| Digital signature certificates | Issuer and trust chain verified | Not publishedLimited |
| Field-level alteration | Yes - the altered field named and located | Document-level flags; extracted fields are returned separately |
| Scans, photos & physical marks | Stamps, embossing, signatures, print artefacts | Scans and photos handled by the capture layer |
| Automated QC on findings | Every finding re-validated before you see it | Not publishedLimited |
| What you get back | A verdict, the field named, in plain English | Fraud flags alongside extracted data |
| Speed & cost | ||
| Time to verdict | About a minute, unattended | Seconds per document (their claim) |
| Price per document | $0.50, published | Not published - subscription or pay-as-you-go, quoted |
| Commitment | None - no seat fees, no minimum, no cap | Platform subscription; fraud detection is one module within it |
| How you start | Self-serve - first top-up matched free, live the same day | Sales-led - quote required |
| Data handling | ||
| Document retention | Zero - analysed in memory, never written to disk | EU-hosted, ISO 27001; documents held for the processing workflow |
| Training on your documents | Never | Custom document types are trained on request |
When to choose TamperCheck
- Your priority is fraud and tamper with output you can read, not standing up a full IDP factory.
- You want managed AI inference and per-document pricing through a single API.
- Risk or legal wants clarity that the service isn't training on your documents by default.
- Signed documents get their certificate checked. A digital signature is only as good as the certificate behind it, so we verify the issuer, whether it sits on a trusted list, and whether the chain holds - as part of the same pass.
When to choose Klippa DocHorizon
- You're investing in document AI at scale: bulk extraction, classification, workflow automation across doc types.
- You already use Klippa for capture/OCR and want one vendor for adjacent steps. Fraud may be bundled rather than best-of-breed standalone.
Best-of-breed tamper vs. doc-AI breadth
Klippa's world is productivity and automation - turning document streams into structured data. TamperCheck's world is adversarial files: what was edited, what's inconsistent, what looks synthetic.
If DocHorizon covers your fraud bar and you're happy in one stack, stay consolidated. If reviewers still argue over pixel-level issues or you need managed AI inference for model governance, a dedicated tamper API is the sharper tool.
TamperCheck vs Klippa DocHorizon: common questions
Is Klippa DocHorizon still called Klippa?
Not on the vendor's own site. SER Group acquired Klippa in March 2025, consolidated its brands under Doxis, and DocHorizon became Doxis AI.dp in March 2026. The fraud detection module is the same lineage; the name, the roadmap owner and the wider platform it sits inside have changed, which is worth knowing before a renewal conversation.
Is Klippa's fraud detection enough on its own?
Depends on what you're defending against. Bundled fraud modules inside automation platforms flag obviously altered files. If your exposure includes documents generated end to end by AI - no edit history to find - it's worth evaluating a dedicated forensic layer that compares each field's rendering against its own page.
Can I use Klippa for extraction and TamperCheck for fraud?
Yes, and that's the cleanest split. Keep your extraction pipeline where it is, call TamperCheck as a single endpoint on the same file. 200+ forensic layers, per-field tamper localisation, no changes to how documents move through your system.
What is the best Klippa DocHorizon alternative for fraud detection?
TamperCheck.ai, when detection quality matters more than consolidation. Single API, 100+ document types from 190+ countries, names the field that changed rather than flagging the document, never trains on your files, $0.50 per document with no template setup.
See results in minutes - not after a sales cycle
Add your first top-up and we'll match it in free credits. No contract, no minimum commitment. Upload your first document and get a verdict within seconds.
Try now