Regula's authenticity checks are built on a 16,500+ template library and hardware readers, strongest on identity and travel documents. Teams switch to TamperCheck when their documents come from issuers Regula's library was never trained on, or when they want published self-serve pricing instead of an annual volume commit.
Why teams look for a Regula alternative
- Your documents aren't identity documents presented to a reader - they're bank statements, invoices and certificates from issuers no template library covers.
- Regula doesn't publish per-document pricing - authenticity is a separate module (AAC) on top of document reading, and Face/liveness is licensed separately again.
- You want a verdict without an annual volume commitment or hardware/on-prem deployment project.
At a glance
The same fifteen questions we answer on the homepage, with Regula in the third column.
Documents covered
- TamperCheck.ai
- 100+ document types from 190+ countries
- Regula
- 16,500+ ID templates from 254 countries, 138+ languages and scripts (their claim)
Forensic checks per document
- TamperCheck.ai
- 200+ forensic layers on every upload
- Regula
- Holograms, IPI, LASINK, MRZ/RFID cross-validation, screenshot and B&W copy detection
AI-generated documents
- TamperCheck.ai
- Dedicated synthesis pass, resolved to the field
- Regula
- Document liveness catches AI-generated images, screenshots and printouts
Image forgery detection
- TamperCheck.ai
- Pixel-level: splice, resave and edge-sharpness deltas
- Regula
- On identity documents, matched against known templates
PDF & file structure
- TamperCheck.ai
- Objects, fonts, metadata and editor traces
- Regula
- Not the product - an ID capture and reader SDK
Field-level alteration
- TamperCheck.ai
- Yes - the altered field named and located
- Regula
- Cross-validates VIZ, MRZ, barcode and NFC against each other
Scans, photos & physical marks
- TamperCheck.ai
- Stamps, embossing, signatures, print artefacts
- Regula
- Their strongest ground - physical security features, and hardware readers
Automated QC on findings
- TamperCheck.ai
- Every finding re-validated before you see it
- Regula
- Not published
What you get back
- TamperCheck.ai
- A verdict, the field named, in plain English
- Regula
- Basic OCR/extract vs AAC authenticity as separate modules; Face/liveness billed apart
Time to verdict
- TamperCheck.ai
- About a minute, unattended
- Regula
- Real-time at capture
Price per document
- TamperCheck.ai
- $0.50, published
- Regula
- Not published - transaction-based, quoted by annual volume
Commitment
- TamperCheck.ai
- None - no seat fees, no minimum, no cap
- Regula
- Annual volume commit or SDK licence - no public pay-as-you-go
How you start
- TamperCheck.ai
- Self-serve - first top-up matched free, live the same day
- Regula
- 30-day free trial, then sales
Document retention
- TamperCheck.ai
- Zero - analysed in memory, never written to disk
- Regula
- Can run fully on-premise - you hold the data
Training on your documents
- TamperCheck.ai
- Never
- Regula
- On-premise deployment keeps documents with you
| TamperCheck.ai | Regula | |
|---|---|---|
| Detection depth | ||
| Documents covered | 100+ document types from 190+ countries | 16,500+ ID templates from 254 countries, 138+ languages and scripts (their claim) |
| Forensic checks per document | 200+ forensic layers on every upload | Holograms, IPI, LASINK, MRZ/RFID cross-validation, screenshot and B&W copy detection |
| AI-generated documents | Dedicated synthesis pass, resolved to the field | Document liveness catches AI-generated images, screenshots and printouts |
| Image forgery detection | Pixel-level: splice, resave and edge-sharpness deltas | On identity documents, matched against known templates |
| PDF & file structure | Objects, fonts, metadata and editor traces | Not the product - an ID capture and reader SDK |
| Field-level alteration | Yes - the altered field named and located | Cross-validates VIZ, MRZ, barcode and NFC against each other |
| Scans, photos & physical marks | Stamps, embossing, signatures, print artefacts | Their strongest ground - physical security features, and hardware readers |
| Automated QC on findings | Every finding re-validated before you see it | Not published |
| What you get back | A verdict, the field named, in plain English | Basic OCR/extract vs AAC authenticity as separate modules; Face/liveness billed apart |
| Speed & cost | ||
| Time to verdict | About a minute, unattended | Real-time at capture |
| Price per document | $0.50, published | Not published - transaction-based, quoted by annual volume |
| Commitment | None - no seat fees, no minimum, no cap | Annual volume commit or SDK licence - no public pay-as-you-go |
| How you start | Self-serve - first top-up matched free, live the same day | 30-day free trial, then sales |
| Data handling | ||
| Document retention | Zero - analysed in memory, never written to disk | Can run fully on-premise - you hold the data |
| Training on your documents | Never | On-premise deployment keeps documents with you |
Regula figures are taken from their own published material - regulaforensics.com Document Reader SDK + support.regulaforensics.com SDK licensing models, checked September 2026. Anything they state about themselves and we cannot verify is marked “their claim”. For the full head-to-head breakdown, see the TamperCheck vs Regula comparison.
What switching gets you
- Template-free analysis - documents from unfamiliar issuers are judged on their own internal consistency, not matched against a library.
- Published $0.50/document pricing, no annual commit, self-serve checkout.
- Cloud-only - no readers, no template packs, no on-prem deployment before your first verdict.
When Regula is still the better fit
- You're standardizing government-grade or bank-wide authenticity specifically on identity and travel documents, where Regula's template depth is real.
- You need hardware or specialized readers alongside software - outside TamperCheck's cloud-API scope.
From template matching to internal consistency
The two methods start from different assumptions, so migrating isn't a drop-in swap - it's a shift in what the check is actually testing. Regula asks "does this match a known genuine template"; TamperCheck asks "is this document internally consistent with itself". For documents Regula has strong template coverage for, expect comparable results on straightforward tamper cases; for anything outside that library, TamperCheck extends coverage Regula's approach structurally can't.
If hardware readers or on-prem deployment are part of your current setup, plan for those to stay in place if you still need them - TamperCheck is cloud-only and doesn't replace physical reader infrastructure, only the forensic software layer.
Regula alternative: common questions
Does TamperCheck replace Regula's hardware readers?
No - TamperCheck is a cloud API with no hardware component. If your current setup uses Regula's readers for physical document capture, that infrastructure stays in place; TamperCheck replaces the forensic software layer, not the capture hardware.
Can TamperCheck check documents Regula's template library doesn't cover?
Yes - that's the structural difference. TamperCheck carries no template library at all, so a document from an issuer it's never seen is analysed to the same standard as a familiar one, using the document's own internal consistency rather than a match against known formats.
Why doesn't Regula publish per-document pricing?
Document Reader is licensed in modules - basic reading versus AAC authenticity - typically on annual transaction volume, with Face/liveness sold separately again. TamperCheck publishes a flat $0.50 per document with no modules to negotiate.
See how TamperCheck handles your own documents
Add your first top-up and we'll match it in free credits. No contract, no minimum commitment. Upload your first document and get a verdict in about a minute.
Try now